Four fabulous female educators

In a previous post I wrote about 3 inspiring educators. In no way did I wish to indicate that the number of inspiring educators was limited to those three or that all inspiring educators are male. The list of inspiring educators is far greater than that and includes both male and female representatives.

The purpose of this post is to both honour, and share the wisdom of, other educators who have positively impacted my life and thinking as an educator and the lives and education of many others. The list doesn’t end here. There will be more to follow.

Maria Montessori (1870 – 1952)

Maria Montessori’s name is known worldwide as the founder of the Montessori Schools. However her influence is not restricted to those schools. Many educational practices implemented, especially in the early childhood setting were influenced by Maria Montessori.

Maria resisted the gender-stereotyping conservative views of Italy where she lived in the late nineteenth century. She developed her interest in maths and sciences, especially biology, and became the first female doctor in Italy.

As a doctor Maria worked with children from poor and working class families. She developed the belief that every child had an intrinsic intelligence. She studied child development and education extensively and developed methods of implementing her theories. She traveled Europe sharing her ideas and advocating women’s and children’s rights. Her success with disabled students led to implementation of her methods with ‘normal’ children.

Montessori’s methods put the child’s interests at the front of the program. The teacher was to ‘follow the lead’ of the child.

Practices now seen as standard that were initiated or influenced by Maria Montessori:

  • incorporation of children’s interests, putting their interests first
  • recognising the development of the individual and making education appropriate to it
  • use of child-sized furniture and shelving
  • practical activities such as sweeping and cleaning up
  • environmental activities such as gardening
  • health and hygiene practices, such as washing hands, sharing morning tea, cooking
  • indoor/outdoor areas that children move about freely
  • opportunities to work independently
  • respecting the child as an individual

She valued independence and saw it as the aim of education, with the teacher as observer/guide of children’s development.

This video explains  a little of her work.

Sylvia Ashton-Warner (1908 – 1984)

Sylvia Ashton-Warner is a New Zealand writer, poet and teacher whose educational work I became familiar with in the 1980s through her books Teacher and Spinster, the latter of which was also made into a movie.

Sylvia, who in the interview below states emphatically that she is not a teacher, that she hates teaching and can’t stand education, has been very influential on teachers around the world.

i was unable to embed the video. Click on the image to go to the original site.

i was unable to embed the video. Click on the image to go to the original site.

Sylvia says,

“There’s a formula for all my teaching. It’s quite simple. I supply the conditions where life can come in the door . . . where both our teacher and our child can be themselves.”

Children-and-even-adults - Sylvia Ashton-Warner

Working with Maori children from poor and dysfunctional families and using organic reading, she developed what is called the ‘Key Vocabulary’; those words holding most meaning and interest to the child. The child asks for a word, the teacher writes it on a card. The child reads the word and copies it to write. The words requested are usually nouns and hold a lot of meaning for the child.

I implemented her ‘Key Vocabulary’ for many years and found it to be a successful tool for developing readers and writers.

 

Marie Clay (1926 – 2007)

Marie Clay is another New Zealand educator best known for her work with literacy education and the Reading Recovery program which was developed to support students whose reading skills were delayed. She believed that early intervention was the key to improving literacy skills.

I first came across her work in her book Reading: The Patterning of Complex Behaviour in 1979. Her 1983 publication Record of Oral Language provided teachers with methods of observing and recording children’s development in literacy.

The Reading Recovery program, based on Marie Clay’s work and developed in the early 1980s, provides one-on-one support for students who are experiencing difficulty with reading in the first years of school. The teachers undergo training which develops their understanding of the reading process and how to support a student’s development. The training is more intensive and thorough with methods specific to this purpose, than generalised teacher education. However knowledge of her research, innovations and methodologies are also of benefit to generalist teachers and have been incorporated into many teacher education programs.

I was very disappointed, as were many other classroom teachers, when this successful program was discontinued in our region earlier this century.

Barbara Arrowsmith-Young (1951 – )

I first heard about Barbara Arrowsmith-Young in Norman Doidge’s book The Brain that Changes Itself.

I couldn’t put this book down. My thinking about the brain and learning was being challenged but excited at the prospect of overcoming learning problems experienced by many students.

For years I watched helplessly as scores of struggling learners were pummelled with repetition of the same boring and meaningless methods that created (or at least contributed to) their problems in the first place; of seeing them humiliated by having to repeat a year at school, or being considered ‘dumb’ because they couldn’t do what the other kids could do. Now here was a book that suggested this need not be so. If only those making the decisions and delivering the programs could be influenced.

One of the most memorable stories from the book was that of Barbara Arrowsmith-Young. Barbara suffered from severe learning disabilities throughout her childhood and early adult years. Every known method of compensating for the disabilities was tried without success. Barbara felt humiliated and a failure.

Her life changed dramatically when she heard about neuroplasticity of the brain (the ability of the brain to change in physiology and functionality) and created exercises for her brain, teaching herself to do things she had never done before.

Her story is an inspiring one of courage, strength, and persistence. Barbara has changed her life. After turning her life around, Barbara has developed programs for others with disabilities to engage with. She started the  Arrowsmith School in  Toronto in 1978. The Arrowsmith Program is now used in schools in the US and Australia as well as Canada.

Barbara’s “vision is of a world that we create in which no child has to live with the ongoing struggle and pain of a learning disability. . . that cognitive exercises become just a normal part of curriculum. . . that school becomes a place that we go to strengthen our brains to become really efficient and effective learners engaged in a learning process where not only, as learners, can we dare to dream, but we can realize our dream . . . This is the perfect marriage between neuroscience and education.”

You can read her story in The Woman Who Changed her Brain, and listen to her speak in this video:

She travels the world sharing her message so you may even have an opportunity of meeting her in person. I saw her last year at the Brisbane Writers’ Festival. Magic!

 

You may have noticed some unifying threads with each of these educators:

A focus on the child, the child’s interests and life

A recognition of the child’s ability to learn

An optimism in the child’s ability to learn, for success and the future

All educators worked with students from disadvantaged backgrounds or with disabilities or both; and all achieved success.

 

I welcome your feedback. Please share your thoughts about any aspect of this article.

 

 

14 thoughts on “Four fabulous female educators

    1. Norah Post author

      Thanks for your comment. You have probably been influenced by them, even if you were unaware of them! The influence of Barbara Arrowsmith Young is just in its infancy. More good things are yet to come.

      Like

      Reply
  1. Caroline

    Thanks Norah – I didnt know about your 4th educaor, while the first three are very familiar to me.The ability of all humans to change, to learn, is something that a whole generation of teachers seemed to forget, especially when they talked about something called ability, and assumed you had it or didnt.
    So glad you are promoting better learning in your part of the world, Norah.

    Like

    Reply
    1. Norah Post author

      Thanks for your positive comments Caroline. I do my best to promote better learning. One of the best ways I can do that is by learning myself and being open to the ideas of others. I know you have talked about having or not having abilities before (in relation to my perceived inability to sing). I think your point is that one ability we all have is the ability to learn. It is very important to remember that. Thanks for the reminder.

      Like

      Reply
  2. lorilschafer

    The neat thing about reading your blog, Norah, is that you always have some insight that’s entirely foreign to my experience. Frankly, I’ve never given teaching or the theories behind it much thought. Yet it’s possibly the profession most likely to influence how young people – and the adults they become – function and behave. Thanks for the fascinating insider’s perspective.

    Like

    Reply
    1. Norah Post author

      Thanks for your encouraging positive comment, Lori. I’m pleased you enjoy reading my blog, and that it has given you something new to think about. I guess that is a major purpose in what we do as bloggers, and definitely in the role of teachers.

      Like

      Reply
  3. TanGental

    Interesting stuff, Norah. Anne’s point re lively children and ADHD is interesting too. I also wonder why (assuming I have this right) the Scandinavians start the child’s formal education so much later than we do in the UK and whether there are pro and cons to that in terms of the impact (or whether is in fact irrelevant). How does it work down under?

    Like

    Reply
    1. Norah Post author

      Hi Geoff,
      There has always been, and probably always will be, lots of discussion about the appropriate age for starting school or for learning particular things. Formal schooling in Australia generally starts at about age 5, though there is slight variation (of about 6 months) from state to state. Years ago I read that children in both Germany and New Zealand began school on their fifth birthdays. I’m not certain if this is correct or if it still occurs but the idea appealed to me, but not if it was into a very formal situation. What a wonderful grown-up thing to look forward to about turning 5 and a fantastic birthday celebration. It would be a special day when you would start school. A staggered introduction to school would enable the teacher to settle children in a few at a time. The experienced children would then be able to model expectations to the newcomers and act as peer tutors. There would be no expectation of ‘sameness’ within the group and there would be greater respect for each child’s development and learning needs. I think Anne’s point about ADHD is a valid one. Ken Robinson also alludes to it in this talk http://goo.gl/1iM7mE

      Like

      Reply
      1. TanGental

        Simply taking my own experience, I agree whole-heartedly that staggering education, tailoring where you can, makes so much sense. August baby syndrome, if I can call it that, is the bane of parents here – with the school year starting on first September the August babies are potentially disadvantaged in their early years. Doesn’t always happen (the Archaeologist was a July baby and he was always far ahead of hi peers). However the idea you can tailor for all is surely impractical? Or is there some sort of middle way like you suggest from the German approach?

        Like

        Reply
        1. Norah Post author

          I think you have summed it up beautifully. The fact that the Archaeologist was younger but always ahead of his peers proves that there is more to learning and education that a number and a year! Focusing on the development of individual children is really the only effective way.

          Liked by 1 person

          Reply
  4. Bec

    Great article, as always Nor! I was surprised to see Maria Montessori is from so long ago – her ideas seem to be still quite profound given the giant institutions they challenge. It was surprising to read that one of the changes she promoted was child-sized furniture: strange to think it was ever anything but child-sized! Funny the things we take for granted.

    Like

    Reply
    1. Norah Post author

      Thanks Bec. I guess it is a hundred years ago that Maria Montessori started her wonderful work. She passed away the year I was born. (Have I given away too much information?) It would be interesting to find out when use of child-sized furniture was introduced into our traditional schools. Must try to check that one out!

      Like

      Reply
  5. Annecdotist

    Thanks for teaching me about these inspiring women, Norah. I especially like the idea of children learning outside with the Montessori method – it scares me nowadays with the increase in diagnosis of ADHD, wondering how much of it is due to lively little children, especially boys, being expected to sit still. And the notion of teaching the child the words s/he wants to know rather than those the experts say s/he should have, it’s so simple and sensible, no wonder it doesn’t get implemented enough!
    And sorry for the nag about your inspiring male teachers – gender shouldn’t matter, but sadly it still does.

    Like

    Reply
    1. Norah Post author

      Hi Anne, Thanks for your comment. The connection you make between outside play and ADHD is interesting. I think sitting at a desk in a classroom for 5 hours a day is not a very natural thing to expect of children. Ken Robinson alludes to the same thing in this talk http://goo.gl/6nqWvz, which I also referred to in my post today http://goo.gl/l1obmD. I see that you and I share the same cynicism about things that are simple and sensible being implemented in schools. You are right to nag me. There are many areas about which I could be nagged and need to grow!

      Like

      Reply

I appreciate your feedback. Please share your thoughts.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s